Mar 31, 2020 sentencing disparities between crack cocaine vs. Cracking the racial disparity for cocaine sentencing center. Crack users were at a higher risk than powder cocaine users for reporting multiple recent arrests or a lifetime arrest. Cracking the racial disparity for cocaine sentencing. Before 1986, federal sentencing laws treated possession of crack and powder cocaine the same. More than 80 percent of federal prisoners serving crack cocaine sentences are black. The amount of powder cocaine necessary to trigger the sentence is still five kilos. How many states maintain sentencing disparities between crack and powder cocaine. Bookers bill would eliminate the crack cocaine sentencing disparity by reducing it from 18. How an early biden crime bill created the sentencing. American drug laws make it pretty clear that our legal system thinks crack is extra whack. Disparity in sentencing for crack vs powder cocaine. For more information on federal laws on cocaine possession, see cocaine. The drug war drives racial disparities in the criminal justice system.
This disparity between crack and powder cocaine was driven by fear, instead of by research, of the intensity and perceived dangers of crack cocaine. For instance, there are federal guidelines ensuring that people who get caught with crack are sentenced more harshly than those who are caught with powder cocaine. Holly mitchells senate bill 1010, which would reduce the sentence for possession of crack cocaine for sale from 35 years to 24 years, thus matching the penalties for powder. Sentencing commission to eliminate the disparities in federal sentencing for crack cocaine and powder cocaine offenses. Support fair and rational sentencing by eliminating the. Jan 29, 2019 crack and power cocaine sentencing disparities. The legislation also eliminates the mandatory minimum for simple possession of crack cocaine. The sentencing project cracked justice crack cocaine. Apr 17, 2020 download page term paper on disparity in sentencing for crack vs. Feb 22, 2015 we wrote this paper to inform the public and congress about the disparities in the sentencing laws between crack and powder cocaine, which continue to have profound legal and social. Clinton signs bill to disapprove of equalizing crack. Crack cocaine sentencing policy prison policy initiative. In 2010, president obama signed the fair sentencing act, which reduced the federal penalty ratios from 100. That year, national news outlets began reporting inflammatory anecdotes supposedly revealing a crack epidemic.
The adaa created a 100toone ratio between the quantity of crack versus powder cocaine needed to trigger mandatory minimum sentencing. Aug 03, 2010 data show racial disparity in crack sentencing congress passed the fair sentencing act to make punishments for crack and cocaine more equal. The house of representatives passed a bill on wednesday that would reduce the disparities between mandatory federal sentences for crack and powder cocaine. The 100to1 cocaine sentencing disparity remained the law of the land until 2010 with the passage of the fair sentencing act, which reduced the sentencing disparity between crack. Additionally, commissioners voted on provisions of the fair sentencing act, which recently reduced the disparities in penalties between powder and crack cocaine, for some prisoners already serving. Data show racial disparity in crack sentencing congress passed the fair sentencing act to make punishments for crack and cocaine more equal. Assistant majority leader dick durbin dil introduced the fair sentencing act of 2009, a narrowlytailored bill that would eliminate the sentencing disparity between crack and powder cocaine and increase penalties for the worst offenders. Chief among these is the racial outcome of the sentencing disparity.
The 100to1 crack cocaine to powder cocaine quantity ratio is a primary cause of the growing disparity between sentences for black and white federal defendants, the commission wrote. It eliminates the disparity in federal sentencing for crack versus powder cocaine offenses, without a shift in the current powder cocaine penalty. This disparity has had a hugely unfair and racially discriminatory impact on minority americans. Congress is considering a bill to change drug laws that punish crack cocaine violations more severely than those for powder cocaine. Today, states maintain sentencing disparities between crack and powder cocaine offenses. Since congress recognized the gaping racial disparity between mandatory minimum sentences for crack offenses and cocaine offenses and reduced the ratio from 100to1 to 18to1, courts have grappled with when and how to apply the statute to alreadydecided cases. Regrettably, the majority opted instead to perpetuate these discriminatory laws by passing and reporting out h. Data show racial disparity in crack sentencing us news. In spite of arguments upholding sentencing differences between crack and powdercocaine, proponents against such disparities need only to. People of color experience discrimination at every stage of the criminal justice system and are more likely to be stopped, searched, arrested, convicted, harshly. Crack cocaine became prevalent in the mid1980s and received massive media attention due in part to its exponential growth in the drug market. Disparity in sentencing for crack vs powder cocaine essay. What is crack cocaine differences between crack and cocaine.
Fair sentencing act american civil liberties union. Download 32page term paper on sentencing disparities between crack cocaine vs. The answer to the problem presented by this wide difference in penalties is not to lower penalties for selling crack cocaine but to increase the penalties for selling powder cocaine, the. Keith ellison spent 16 years as a trial lawyer dealing with hundreds of cases involving cocaine arrests. Because crack and powder cocaine are two forms of the same drug, there should not be any disparity in sentencing between crack and powder cocaine offenses the only truly fair ratio is 1. Specifically, congress directed the sentencing commission to report on the current federal structure of. In fiscal year 2010, before the passage of the fair sentencing act, almost 4,000 defendants, mainly black, received mandatory minimum sentences for crack cocaine. The sentencing disparities between crack and cocaine attn. Falsely treating crack cocaine as 50 times more addictive than powder cocaine, as congress did more than in creating the 100toone quantity ratio, has implications beyond that of mere unfair sentencing. This report addresses disparities in cocaine sentencing in states and documents efforts at the federal and state level to correct these injustices. After cocaine and baking soda are combined, the mixture is boiled, and a solid forms. Crack and cocaine powder sentencing disparities essay. The bill does not eliminate the disparity, but dramatically reduces it. Federal sentencing disparity, 20052012, examines patterns of federal sentencing disparity among white and black offenders, by sentence received, and looks at judicial variation in sentencing since booker vs.
A 2010 federal law rectified some, though not all, of the sentencing disparities. Federal crack cocaine sentencing the sentencing project. Regardless of changes in the federal law, a charge of crack or powder cocaine is a very serious charge. President barack obama on august 3, 2010 that reduced the disparity between the amount of crack cocaine and powder cocaine needed to trigger certain federal criminal penalties from a 100. After a decade of contentious debate regarding the federal sentencing disparities between crack cocaine and powder cocaine, a number of significant initiatives to reform current. Iowa during 2003, the iowa legislature lowered its sentencing disparity from. A 2015 study published in the journal drug and alcohol dependence examined the socioeconomic disparities among powder cocaine users and crack users. Douglas berman, law professor at ohio state university, talks with michele norris about how the disparity in sentencing minimums between crack and powdered cocaine. Jul 28, 2019 the 100to1 crack cocaine to powder cocaine quantity ratio is a primary cause of the growing disparity between sentences for black and white federal defendants, the commission wrote. Federal sentencing disparity, 20052012, examines patterns of federal sentencing disparity among white and black offenders, by sentence received, and looks at judicial variation in sentencing.
Human rights watch wrote the following letter expressing support of california state senate bill sb 1010 which would reduce the disparities in penalties between crack and powder cocaine. After president obama signed off on new legislation to reduce the sentencing disparity between people caught with crack cocaine and those caught with powder cocaine, the minnesota democrat spoke to huffpost about what it all means. Bernie sanders called for the same in 2015, prompting his democratic presidential rival. Powder cocaine after a decade of contentious debate regarding the federal sentencing disparities between crack cocaine and powder cocaine, a number of significant initiatives to reform current policy have recently emerged. Supreme court ruled that the reductions in the fair sentencing act applied to at least those cases decided before. Congress moves to narrow sentencing disparities for crack. Jul 01, 2014 in 2010, president obama signed the fair sentencing act, which reduced the federal penalty ratios from 100. Crack cocaine first hit the national radar in 1986 but, contrary to media reports, it was not a new drug. The explosive popularity of crack cocaine was associated with its cheap price, which for the first time made cocaine available to a wider economic class.
Crack cocaine disparity, the fair sentencing act 2010. Specifically, the penalty for possessing 500g of powder cocaine was comparable to possessing only 5g of crack. The fair sentencing act of 2010 was an act of congress that was signed into federal law by u. The commission establishes sentencing policies and practices for the federal courts. Misguided drug laws and draconian sentencing have produced profoundly unequal outcomes for communities of color. The 1986 law created a 100 to 1 disparity between the sentencing guidelines for crack and powder cocaine. The new law significantly reduces the cocaine sentencing quantity disparity from 100 to 1 to 18 to 1 by raising the quantity of crack cocaine necessary to trigger the five and tenyear mandatory minimum sentences first set in 1986. Africanamericans now serve virtually as much time in prison for a drug offense 58. The general assembly eliminated the sentencing disparity between crack cocaine and powder cocaine by increasing the trigger quantity for crack cocaine to onehalf ounce approximately 14. Obama commutes 8 crack cocaine sentences usa today. So, the federal law still imposes a different and harsher sentence for crack cocaine possession than it does for powder cocaine possession, but the disparity is not nearly as great as under the 1986 act.
Congress directed the united states sentencing commission to study federal sentencing policy as it relates to possession and distribution of all forms of cocaine. A comprehensive examination of the 100to1 crack versus powder cocaine sentencing disparity under which distribution of just 5 grams of crack carries a minimum 5year federal prisonsentence, while distribution of 500 grams of powder cocaine carries the same 5year mandatory minimum sentence. Despite the fact that the chemical structure of powder cocaine and crack cocaine is nearly identical, the punishment for crack possession or sales is far greater than that of cocaine. In a statement in the congressional record, breaux said he was honestly shocked to learn of the sentencing disparity between crack and powder cocaine. Congress passed the fair sentencing act to make punishments for crack and cocaine more equal. In the mid 80s, congress passed the antidrug abuse act of 1986. Whereas, proposals to remove the federal mandatory minimums for crack and powder cocaine, and to otherwise eliminate the disparity for crack and powder cocaine by sentencing crack in the same manner that powder cocaine is currently sentenced, would threaten efforts to investigate and prosecute significant and violent drug offenders that deal.
Regardless of changes in the federal law, a charge of crack or powder cocaine. In 2010 congress passed the fair sentencing act, which repealed the mandatory minimum sentence for simple possession and reduced the sentencing disparity from 100. Under what is commonly referred to as the 100to1 cocaine sentencing disparity, it takes one hundred times as much powder cocaine as crack cocaine to trigger the federal mandatory minimums. This is the united states sentencing commissions first report to congress on the subject of federal cocaine sentencing policy.
Download page term paper on disparity in sentencing for crack vs. Sentencing disparity primary sources topics in criminal. But during negotiations it became clear that congress was in agreement. It also brings crack sentencing in line with powder cocaine, as well as with all other drugs, by applying mandatory minimums only to dealers and not those convicted of simple possession. Dec 19, 20 president cites sentencing disparities between crack and powder cocaine new legislation has reduced sentencing disparities previously%2c obama had commuted only one sentence in the five years of. This guide highlights the incredible breadth, depth and reliability of government information on this topic. Jan 02, 2020 bookers bill would eliminate the crack cocaine sentencing disparity by reducing it from 18. The commission reported in 2004 that revising the crack cocaine thresholds would better reduce the sentencing gap than any other single policy change, and it would dramatically improve the fairness of the federal sentencing. In 1995 the commission concluded that the violence associated with. Similarly, those carrying ten grams of crack cocaine. Congress passed laws that created a 100 to 1 sentencing disparity for the possession or trafficking of crack when compared to penalties for trafficking of powder cocaine, which had been widely criticized as discriminatory against minorities, mostly africanamericans, who were more likely to use crack than powder cocaine. Until now, there was a sentencing disparity of 100. In missouri, where a defendant convicted of selling six grams of crack cocaine faces the same prison term a tenyear mandatory minimum as someone who sells 450 grams of powder cocaine, or 75 times that amount. Today states maintain sentencing disparities between crack and powder cocaine offenses.
Since the law went into effect, the ratio dropped to 18to1. Feb 19, 2015 specifically, the penalty for possessing 500g of powder cocaine was comparable to possessing only 5g of crack. Some 2020 democratic candidate argue that the sentencing disparity between crack cocaine and powder cocaine, which now sits at 18to1. Crack and cocaine powder sentencing disparities essay sample. The fair sentencing act was a step forward, but it did not finish the job. The fair sentencing act 2010 reduced sentencing disparities to 18. Cocaine is a hydrochloride salt in its powdered form, while crack cocaine is derived from powdered cocaine by combining it with water and another substance, usually baking soda sodium bicarbonate. Activists argue that the current rules are too harsh. Now, the ten year sentence is triggered by 280 grams of crack instead of 50. Before this law was passed, the united states had a 100to1 crack topowder cocaine sentencing disparity. A comprehensive examination of the 100to1 crack versus powder cocaine sentencing disparity under which distribution of just 5 grams of crack carries a. There are federal guidelines ensuring that people who get caught with crack are sentenced more harshly than those who are caught with. As a result, the bill lessening the disparity to 18.
155 1556 165 469 290 545 878 64 875 986 156 923 1552 187 1219 450 566 231 1143 716 1 625 617 1150 133 85 704 990 166 877 85 461